Corporate entity information is critical data that underpins nearly every business process. Maintaining and operationalizing this data for several different strategic purposes is a large part of today’s legal landscape.
However, as recently reported by EY, 89% of legal department leads face substantial challenges with their entity management, causing significant concerns about their deal readiness. Transactions get delayed because subsidiaries aren’t in good standing, have outdated appointee records, or encounter other administrative friction.
The fundamental reasons for creating subsidiary entities are:
However important this data is, it is equally complex to manage. Often, entity management is a shared responsibility between legal tax and finance departments, causing communication gaps across departments. Collaboration between multiple teams is usually a substantial challenge for most large organizations that leads to friction around ownership and responsibility.
Systematic entity management maintenance is also hindered by outdated technology. 96% of legal departments report issues with their legal entity management software. 72% find it difficult to keep systems updated and 62% found it challenging to track governance activity statuses.
In addition, many organizations tend to naturally leverage a decentralized mesh of law firms by managing entities for basic statutory compliance. This model can create coordination and cost management challenges. Currently, 47% of legal departments currently operate in this decentralized model.
Companies with advanced entity management functions align on an established and common framework for their entities, whether documented in a playbook, SLA, or Subsidiary Governance Framework.
These systems establish a consistent approach for governance and set minimum standards for activities such as:
For more best practices and an in-depth overview of Subsidiary Governance Frameworks (with examples), you can access Athennian’s free eBook, "Best Practices in Subsidiary Management."